My Picture Book "A Letter About Michael" is available on Amazon . com
All Proceeds to benefit SFACS . org A Charter School in Hialeah, Florida
WE ARE THE FIRST FLORIDA PARENTS TO EXERCISE OUR RIGHT UNDER PARENT TRIGGER LETTER LAW OF 2004. (1002.33 3(B) . THIS LAW ALLOWS PARENTS TO CALL A VOTE TO CONVERT A DISTRICT SCHOOL TO CHARTER RUN SCHOOL . WE HAVE CHRONICLED & EXPOSED THE LAWS FLAWS THROUGH TRAVAILS AND TRIAL OF LEGAL PROCESS TO CALL THE VOTE . IT MUST BE AMENDED SO TEACHERS CAN NOT HOLD SCHOOL CHOICE PARENTS HOSTAGE .THIS IN ESSENCE RENDERS THE FLORIDA CLASS SIZE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT MEANINGLESS. THIS IS OUR STORY
My Picture Book "A Letter About Michael" is available on Amazon . com
All Proceeds to benefit SFACS . org A Charter School in Hialeah, Florida
When Florida Politicians get it half right the other half really wrong. HB 109 from 2024 sponsored by Alex Andrade https://x.com/ralexandradefl?lang=en is such a bill. What does affordable Housing have to do with Public School building property? Nothing. Amending the law affording municipalities is not the answer for poor performing school facilities. Nor is putting up the school property for other uses. School facilities are sacred grounds of any state and epicenter of a flourishing or failing neighborhood.
Amending Florida's Parent Empowerment Law 1002.33 (3)(b) is a voting rights amendment of its present un-American close society voting guidelines not a rezoning surplus real estate bill for municipalities. Do parents want to contend with an additional government school board? Get Real.
This what matters going forward:
#1 Teachers should not be requirement of the intra-school election for passage of the conversion.
#2 Parent Proponent's that force the vole must be protected from Teacher's union abuse of their children in class and on campus.
#3 This protection language must protect children from opposing parents who may seek to intimidate a child of the two Parent Proponents during the campaign for a 'Yes"vote on the 5 day election week
#4 Parent proponent must be allowed the student mailing list in ballot mailing list to assure the advantages the conversion to Parent Guardianship is disclosed and invitations to several meetings at the school in question.
#5 This campaign literature must accompany the ballot itself in the same mailing the School District send with the ballot itself.
#6 the the laws title language must be changed to conversion to Parent Guardianship School. Eliminate the word "Charter" from the law's Title for one obvious reason: it is NOT a Charter School business model. The Parents that convert are acting as guardians of existing school which will be funded by the State of Florida Department of Education not the county School District. Parent Guardianship School will not be paying rent to a Charter School developer for a new facility, or off campus location for existing school buildings and playgrounds.
I would know I am the first Florida PTA President in state history to establish the legal precedent for all of sunshine state parents in 2013 at KB K8 Center in Key Biscayne Florida. Today the law has gone unchanged for over a decade and worst of all, it gives the Teacher's Union veto power over parents and tremendous rebuttal of the 'Yes" vote success. Basically undermining the spirit of the original law.
The actual law amendment law's language text that I am suggesting can be read in its entirety
at: https://thefiscals.us/governing-school-act.html
+++++++
I wasn't exaggerating back in 2013. Read posts back in 2013 blog posts. รณ

When Megan Diediker was first diagnosed with breast cancer at age 34, the high school geometry teacher wondered whether something in the environment could have played a role.
But she eventually let the questions go, she said, to focus on getting better.
Then a colleague fell ill last year with an aggressive brain cancer. It was the seventh cancer diagnosis among staff at Park High School in Cottage Grove in six years, Diediker said — nearly all in people under age 50. Before long, she and some colleagues had drawn up a list of nearly 30 current and former Park High staff who contracted various cancers since 1990, some of them twice. Two — one of whom since died from the cancer — shared the same classroom.
"I revisited everything and thought 'What is going on here?' " Diediker said.
The Minnesota Department of Health reviewed the matter and concluded it is not a cancer cluster. Proven cancer clusters are rare.
Even so, Diediker sees red flags. She and another teacher have retained a lawyer and plan to submit individual workers' compensation claims to the South Washington County School District, along with three other current and former employees.
Diediker says they don't know whether something in the school played a role in their cancers, but they hope that the process of vetting the workers' comp claims will shed light on the situation. Diediker, who coaches girls basketball and lives in Mahtomedi, said she loves working at Park High and just wants to know that the people who work there are safe.
As it happens, Cottage Grove is ground zero in Minnesota for water contamination from a set of compounds known PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), the cancer-linked "forever chemicals" that are the subject of a 20-year remediation project. 3M Co. manufactured the original chemicals for decades at its Chemolite Plant there and dumped contaminated waste in four nearby landfills. Washington County is the focus of an $850 million court settlement the state reached with 3M in 2018 for damage to drinking water and the environment.
Lawsuit a possibility
If the workers' comp investigation establishes a link between the diseases and some third factor, the teachers may consider a lawsuit, said Dean Salita, the personal injury lawyer they retained. Salita said the worker's comp claims should be filed within two months.
The cancers just seem too coincidental, Salita said. "Mother Nature is not that unkind to that many people in one school."
Keith Jacobus, superintendent of South Washington County Schools, said he's taking the matter seriously. He discussed it with the district's facilities staff last fall and directed them to contact the state Department of Health, where officials said they didn't think there was a health risk at the school.
"We have to follow the expertise of people who know this, versus making judgment calls of our own," Jacobus said.
'Our water is clean and safe'
Salita and the teachers say they can't point to a culprit in the cancers. Diediker mentioned PFAS. One idea they've floated is asbestos.
The school's asbestos abatement was carried out by a state-approved contractor in 2008-2010 while school was in session and involved the installation of a new ventilation system. But asbestos is primarily associated with lung cancer, and only one employee on the Park High list was stricken with that form.
Several of the city wells that serve the school, wells No. 3-9, have tested above the current Minnesota health limits for different PFAS compounds over the last decade, according to a Star Tribune review of state Department of Health well testing data. In some of those tests, concentrations were more than twice the state's safety limit.
But city officials say they're confident the school's water is not an issue; the wells that supply Park High are regularly tested for PFAS, and the city has dealt with the wells that have tested above the state's health-based values for various PFAS compounds.
Well No. 3, for example, was outfitted with a carbon filter system. Wells No. 4 and 6 were shut down in 2017 when the state tightened safety benchmarks for certain PFAS. Concentrations of certain PFAS in three other wells have spiked a few times in recent years, but that water is blended with the water from a safe well and is within all thresholds, according to City Engineer Ryan Burfeind.
"Our water is clean and safe to drink," Burfeind said.
It might not have been in years past, however.
Margee Brown, a research scientist at the state Health Department, said she doubts the Park High case meets the American Cancer Society definition of a cancer cluster: "a greater-than-expected number of cancer cases that occurs within a group of people in a defined geographic area over a specific period of time."
Brown said the Park High list includes people with several different types of cancer over nearly 30 years, which suggests no single environmental cause. "It does not appear that unusual, based on what we know about cancer and how common it is," she said.
"Roughly four out of 10 of us will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in our lives,'' Brown added. "I think a lot of people are not aware of that."
Dozens of inquiries
The Health Department fields dozens of inquiries about perceived community cancer clusters each year but has confirmed only two in the past 40 years that were linked to environmental or occupational exposures: mesothelioma related to asbestos exposure on the Iron Range, and lung cancers and mesothelioma in northeast Minneapolis related to asbestos from a W.R. Grace & Co. vermiculite processing plant.
Brown said she empathizes with the fear and anxiety that cancer provokes. "People make these associations, naturally," she said.
Brown's findings echo the department's larger investigation of health outcomes in areas of Washington County contaminated with PFAS. It found no clusters of cancer, premature births or low-birth-weight babies.
But an expert witness hired by then-state Attorney General Lori Swanson when she sued 3M came to different conclusions. David Sunding, a natural resources economist at the University of California, Berkeley, concluded that Washington County residents have elevated rates of cancer, infertility and low-birth-weight babies.
Not all the Park High cancer survivors see a connection between their illnesses.
Retired teacher Christine Norton, who was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990 and co-founded the Minnesota Breast Cancer Coalition, said that 28 cases "just does not seem like a high number" for a school of that size. "People want an explanation," Norton added.
Diediker is not persuaded. She strongly disagrees with the state's finding.
"I think it's totally [wrong], and the lawyers agree," she said. "There's something in the building."
Staff writer MaryJo Webster contributed to this report.
Let's Change the Conversion to Charter Statute to the Parent Guardianship School
As the KBK8 Center Parent who in 2013 fired the first ever Parent trigger in US History thus, establishing the legal precedent for the state below, it must be amended as it is an Un-American law. My daughter's fifth grade experience as the daughter of the Parent Proponent and KB PTA President at the time asked to resign , I can tell you the law's voting guideline not have veto power for Teacher's Union over parental vote instilled in the law's language. Not only only does this determine that this Teacher's Empowerment Law when executed by further more facilitate student reprisal during class by teachers in opposition but create a campus environment that is not conducive to improving circumstance both in the physical plant of school buildings but also Parent intimidation during the campaign event to establish a financial authority over the school's administration finances replacing the County School District Superintendent. When amended as we suggest it will be the single most important school reinvention parents have demanding doe last 65 years of Teaching Collective bargaining rights ruined public schooling during the progressive regressive era. This is how the law reads today:
(b) An application for a conversion charter school shall be made by the district school board, the principal, teachers, parents, and/or the school advisory council at an existing public school that has been in operation for at least 2 years prior to the application to convert. A public school-within-a-school that is designated as a school by the district school board may also submit an application to convert to charter status. An application submitted proposing to convert an existing public school to a charter school shall demonstrate the support of at least 50 percent of the teachers employed at the school and 50 percent of the parents voting whose children are enrolled at the school, provided that a majority of the parents eligible to vote participate in the ballot process, according to rules adopted by the State Board of Education. A district school board denying an application for a conversion charter school shall provide notice of denial to the applicants in writing within 10 days after the meeting at which the district school board denied the application. The notice must articulate in writing the specific reasons for denial and must provide documentation supporting those reasons. A private school, parochial school, or home education program shall not be eligible for charter school status.
The Following is the Amended law based on our negative experiences in bold:
(a) An application for a new Parent Guardianship School may be made by an individual, teachers, parents, a group of individuals, a municipality, or a legal entity organized under the laws of this state. (b) An application for a conversion charter school shall be made by the district school board, the principal, teachers, parents, and/or the school advisory council at an existing public school that has been in operation for at least 2 years prior to the application to convert. A public school-within-a-school that is designated as a school by the district school board may also submit an application to convert to charter status. An application submitted proposing to convert an existing public school to a charter school shall demonstrate the support of at least 50 percent of the teachers employed at the school and 50 percent of the parents voting whose children are enrolled at the school, provided that a majority of the parents eligible to vote participate in the ballot process, according to rules adopted by the State Board of Education. The vote for conversion shall be required to be completed within ninety (90) days from the date the school administrator receives the written request for a vote. The local school district shall be required to make certain mandatory disclosures once a school administrator receives the written request to conduct a vote. Within seven (7) days of receipt of the written request, the local school district shall provide to the person requesting the vote the following items (1) a detailed budget showing all expenses and all state and federal revenues generated over the previous three years for the particular district-operated school for which a vote for conversion has been requested, and (2) a list containing the public mailing address of each household with child enrolled at the school at that time. At least fourteen (14) days prior to the commencement of any vote, the local school district shall permit the person or persons requesting the vote to utilize the school cafeteria or other indoor equivalent facility, at the school that is the subject of the vote, to hold a meeting at a reasonable time to provide information to the parents in support of the vote. The person or persons who requested the vote shall be entitled to organize and lead the meeting and to provide on the premises where the meeting will be held written educational material to the parents who attend the meeting. The person or persons who requested the vote shall be entitled to have a designee assigned to work with the school administrator to confirm that the initial notification has been mailed to all eligible voters and that all ballots have been mailed to the eligible voters and to be present at the time of balloting in order to confirm the voters eligibility and witnessing the voters casting the ballot. The person or persons who requested the vote shall be entitled to draft the content of the initial notification to the parents, describing the purpose of the vote and the conditions for the balloting process as well as the content of the ballot itself. A district school board denying an application for a conversion charter school shall provide notice of denial to the applicants in writing within 10 days after the meeting at which the district school board denied the application. The notice must articulate in writing the specific reasons for denial and must provide documentation supporting those reasons. A private school, parochial school, or home education program shall not be eligible for charter school status.
TheEntirety of the law is as follows from Florida's State Statutes:
https://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2011/1002.33
