Friday, March 12, 2021

Another Cancer Cluster Amongst Teacher in Cottage Grove School in Minnesota

I wasn't exaggerating back in 2013. Read posts back in 2013 blog posts. ó


 https://www.startribune.com/cancer-cases-prompt-cottage-grove-teachers-to-demand-investigation/567027692/


Cancer cases prompt Cottage Grove teachers to demand investigation

She suspects "something in building" may have played role in nearly 30 cancer cases. 

When Megan Diediker was first diagnosed with breast cancer at age 34, the high school geometry teacher wondered whether something in the environment could have played a role.

But she eventually let the questions go, she said, to focus on getting better.

Then a colleague fell ill last year with an aggressive brain cancer. It was the seventh cancer diagnosis among staff at Park High School in Cottage Grove in six years, Diediker said — nearly all in people under age 50. Before long, she and some colleagues had drawn up a list of nearly 30 current and former Park High staff who contracted various cancers since 1990, some of them twice. Two — one of whom since died from the cancer — shared the same classroom.

"I revisited everything and thought 'What is going on here?' " Diediker said.

The Minnesota Department of Health reviewed the matter and concluded it is not a cancer cluster. Proven cancer clusters are rare.

Even so, Diediker sees red flags. She and another teacher have retained a lawyer and plan to submit individual workers' compensation claims to the South Washington County School District, along with three other current and former employees.

Diediker says they don't know whether something in the school played a role in their cancers, but they hope that the process of vetting the workers' comp claims will shed light on the situation. Diediker, who coaches girls basketball and lives in Mahtomedi, said she loves working at Park High and just wants to know that the people who work there are safe.

As it happens, Cottage Grove is ground zero in Minnesota for water contamination from a set of compounds known PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), the cancer-linked "forever chemicals" that are the subject of a 20-year remediation project. 3M Co. manufactured the original chemicals for decades at its Chemolite Plant there and dumped contaminated waste in four nearby landfills. Washington County is the focus of an $850 million court settlement the state reached with 3M in 2018 for damage to drinking water and the environment.

Lawsuit a possibility

If the workers' comp investigation establishes a link between the diseases and some third factor, the teachers may consider a lawsuit, said Dean Salita, the personal injury lawyer they retained. Salita said the worker's comp claims should be filed within two months.

The cancers just seem too coincidental, Salita said. "Mother Nature is not that unkind to that many people in one school."

Keith Jacobus, superintendent of South Washington County Schools, said he's taking the matter seriously. He discussed it with the district's facilities staff last fall and directed them to contact the state Department of Health, where officials said they didn't think there was a health risk at the school.

"We have to follow the expertise of people who know this, versus making judgment calls of our own," Jacobus said.

'Our water is clean and safe'

Salita and the teachers say they can't point to a culprit in the cancers. Diediker mentioned PFAS. One idea they've floated is asbestos.

The school's asbestos abatement was carried out by a state-approved contractor in 2008-2010 while school was in session and involved the installation of a new ventilation system. But asbestos is primarily associated with lung cancer, and only one employee on the Park High list was stricken with that form.

Several of the city wells that serve the school, wells No. 3-9, have tested above the current Minnesota health limits for different PFAS compounds over the last decade, according to a Star Tribune review of state Department of Health well testing data. In some of those tests, concentrations were more than twice the state's safety limit.

But city officials say they're confident the school's water is not an issue; the wells that supply Park High are regularly tested for PFAS, and the city has dealt with the wells that have tested above the state's health-based values for various PFAS compounds.

Well No. 3, for example, was outfitted with a carbon filter system. Wells No. 4 and 6 were shut down in 2017 when the state tightened safety benchmarks for certain PFAS. Concentrations of certain PFAS in three other wells have spiked a few times in recent years, but that water is blended with the water from a safe well and is within all thresholds, according to City Engineer Ryan Burfeind.

"Our water is clean and safe to drink," Burfeind said.

It might not have been in years past, however.

Margee Brown, a research scientist at the state Health Department, said she doubts the Park High case meets the American Cancer Society definition of a cancer cluster: "a greater-than-expected number of cancer cases that occurs within a group of people in a defined geographic area over a specific period of time."

Brown said the Park High list includes people with several different types of cancer over nearly 30 years, which suggests no single environmental cause. "It does not appear that unusual, based on what we know about cancer and how common it is," she said.

"Roughly four out of 10 of us will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in our lives,'' Brown added. "I think a lot of people are not aware of that."

Dozens of inquiries

The Health Department fields dozens of inquiries about perceived community cancer clusters each year but has confirmed only two in the past 40 years that were linked to environmental or occupational exposures: mesothelioma related to asbestos exposure on the Iron Range, and lung cancers and mesothelioma in northeast Minneapolis related to asbestos from a W.R. Grace & Co. vermiculite processing plant.

Brown said she empathizes with the fear and anxiety that cancer provokes. "People make these associations, naturally," she said.

Brown's findings echo the department's larger investigation of health outcomes in areas of Washington County contaminated with PFAS. It found no clusters of cancer, premature births or low-birth-weight babies.

But an expert witness hired by then-state Attorney General Lori Swanson when she sued 3M came to different conclusions. David Sunding, a natural resources economist at the University of California, Berkeley, concluded that Washington County residents have elevated rates of cancer, infertility and low-birth-weight babies.

Not all the Park High cancer survivors see a connection between their illnesses.

Retired teacher Christine Norton, who was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990 and co-founded the Minnesota Breast Cancer Coalition, said that 28 cases "just does not seem like a high number" for a school of that size. "People want an explanation," Norton added.

Diediker is not persuaded. She strongly disagrees with the state's finding.

"I think it's totally [wrong], and the lawyers agree," she said. "There's something in the building."

Staff writer MaryJo Webster contributed to this report.





Sunday, January 10, 2021

Parent Guardianship School under Governing School Act

Let's Change the Conversion to Charter Statute to the Parent Guardianship School 

As the KBK8 Center Parent who in 2013 fired the first ever Parent trigger in US History thus, establishing the legal precedent for the state below, it must be amended as it is an Un-American law. My daughter's fifth grade experience as the daughter of the Parent Proponent and KB PTA President at the time asked to resign , I can tell you the law's voting guideline not have veto power for Teacher's Union over parental vote instilled in the law's language. Not only only does this determine that this Teacher's Empowerment Law when executed by further more facilitate student reprisal during class by teachers in opposition but create a campus environment that is not conducive to improving circumstance both in the physical plant of school buildings but also Parent intimidation during the campaign event to establish a financial authority over the school's administration finances replacing the County School District Superintendent. When amended as we suggest it will be the single most important school reinvention parents have demanding doe last 65 years of Teaching Collective bargaining rights ruined public schooling during the progressive regressive era. This is how the law reads today: 

(b) An application for a conversion charter school shall be made by the district school board, the principal, teachers, parents, and/or the school advisory council at an existing public school that has been in operation for at least 2 years prior to the application to convert. A public school-within-a-school that is designated as a school by the district school board may also submit an application to convert to charter status. An application submitted proposing to convert an existing public school to a charter school shall demonstrate the support of at least 50 percent of the teachers employed at the school and 50 percent of the parents voting whose children are enrolled at the school, provided that a majority of the parents eligible to vote participate in the ballot process, according to rules adopted by the State Board of Education. A district school board denying an application for a conversion charter school shall provide notice of denial to the applicants in writing within 10 days after the meeting at which the district school board denied the application. The notice must articulate in writing the specific reasons for denial and must provide documentation supporting those reasons. A private school, parochial school, or home education program shall not be eligible for charter school status.

The Following is the Amended law based on our negative experiences in bold: 

(a) An application for a new Parent Guardianship School may be made by an individual, teachers, parents, a group of individuals, a municipality, or a legal entity organized under the laws of this state. (b) An application for a conversion charter school shall be made by the district school board, the principal, teachers, parents, and/or the school advisory council at an existing public school that has been in operation for at least 2 years prior to the application to convert. A public school-within-a-school that is designated as a school by the district school board may also submit an application to convert to charter status. An application submitted proposing to convert an existing public school to a charter school shall demonstrate the support of at least 50 percent of the teachers employed at the school and 50 percent of the parents voting whose children are enrolled at the school, provided that a majority of the parents eligible to vote participate in the ballot process, according to rules adopted by the State Board of Education. The vote for conversion shall be required to be completed within ninety (90) days from the date the school administrator receives the written request for a vote. The local school district shall be required to make certain mandatory disclosures once a school administrator receives the written request to conduct a vote. Within seven (7) days of receipt of the written request, the local school district shall provide to the person requesting the vote the following items (1) a detailed budget showing all expenses and all state and federal revenues generated over the previous three years for the particular district-operated school for which a vote for conversion has been requested, and (2) a list containing the public mailing address of each household with child enrolled at the school at that time. At least fourteen (14) days prior to the commencement of any vote, the local school district shall permit the person or persons requesting the vote to utilize the school cafeteria or other indoor equivalent facility, at the school that is the subject of the vote, to hold a meeting at a reasonable time to provide information to the parents in support of the vote. The person or persons who requested the vote shall be entitled to organize and lead the meeting and to provide on the premises where the meeting will be held written educational material to the parents who attend the meeting. The person or persons who requested the vote shall be entitled to have a designee assigned to work with the school administrator to confirm that the initial notification has been mailed to all eligible voters and that all ballots have been mailed to the eligible voters and to be present at the time of balloting in order to confirm the voters eligibility and witnessing the voters casting the ballot. The person or persons who requested the vote shall be entitled to draft the content of the initial notification to the parents, describing the purpose of the vote and the conditions for the balloting process as well as the content of the ballot itself. A district school board denying an application for a conversion charter school shall provide notice of denial to the applicants in writing within 10 days after the meeting at which the district school board denied the application. The notice must articulate in writing the specific reasons for denial and must provide documentation supporting those reasons. A private school, parochial school, or home education program shall not be eligible for charter school status.

TheEntirety of the law is as follows from Florida's State Statutes:


https://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2011/1002.33


Saturday, February 22, 2020

Mike Bileca Termed Out but his Educational Reform Law HB 7069 is in the Courts

It looks Like School Schioce Hypocrite Mike Bileca has some explaining to do. I forgot he is termed out. Another pitfall of Term limits. Proponents Parent Guardianship School .com are left out of Reform Bill. Stay Tuned.

WFTS - Tampa, Florida

Florida schools and state battle over HB 7069's constitutionality in appeal hearing

'The constitution puts it very plainly'
Posted: 5:51 PM, Jun 11, 2019

Updated: 5:51 PM, Jun 11, 2019


Mike Bileca's HB 7069 Goes to Court over constitutionality


It was round two in the battle over whether a controversial Florida education bill is unconstitutional.
The law in question, was adopted in 2017 and created a charter program known as “Schools of Hope” for low performing districts.
The law was upheld in a lower court— but Tuesday, a panel of appellate judges from Florida’s First District Court of Appeal heard from lawyers arguing whether the law gives the state too much power over school districts.
In their push to throw out HB 7069, lawyers representing 10 Florida districts argued the state’s ability to create charter schools and give them local dollars, without a district’s OK, was a violation of Florida’s constitution.
Attorney Steven Brannock, representing the districts, cited a section from the 60s.
“The constitution puts it very plainly,” Brannock said. “The school boards ‘shall operate, control and supervise all free public schools within the district.’”Lawyers for the state dismissed control concerns, saying districts can still approve and terminate charter contracts.
Attorney Rocco Testani, representing the state, also aimed to make a bigger point, saying a constitutional revision from the 90s gave the state power to “make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders.”
“What these districts are saying, what these boards are saying— we want to be left alone,” Testani said. “They don’t want to perform the duties that have been enacted in law. They’re not being prevented from doing anything.”
HB 7069 was narrowly approved by lawmakers and heavily criticized in 2017. Some doubted whether then-Governor Rick Scott would even sign the bill after reports suggested Floridians were calling for a veto by a margin of 3-to-1.
The three-judge appellate panel ended the hearing without comment— though they did question whether the districts had authority to challenge the law at all.
While attorneys for the state declined comment outside the courtroom, Brannock said he was uncertain what the outcome would be.
“It’s awfully hard to tell from the questions from the court,” Brannock said. “I think we gave the best answers that we had. Now, we’ll see what the court does with that.”
Attorneys believed it likely judges would want to write opinions about the case, meaning it could take months before a decision is announced.

Thursday, October 31, 2019

REASON.ORG Says Parents Shpould have the Money For Public School. But How? Without Florida Direct Ballot Parent Trigger Spreading Nationwide?

THIS IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY UNTIL PARENTS ARE THE ACTUAL GUARDIANS OF DISTRICT OPERATED SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUDGET OF  FACILITIES IS NEIGHBORHOODS THAT CAN CALL THE VOTE AS PER DIRECT BALLOT PARENT TRIGGER





TheHill.com

Why we should send education dollars directly to schools

BY AARON GARTH SMITH, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 10/29/19 07:00 AM EDT  98THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

Ask an education expert about school finance and they’ll likely give an opinion about whether there’s enough funding. But two new studies suggest that another issue deserves attention: Who gets to decide how $694 billion is spent on public education each year?  
A recent survey by Pew Research Center gauged Americans’ perceptions about eight groups of leaders including legislators, journalists and tech executives, and the results paint a gloomy picture. For example, 81 percent responded that members of Congress act unethically, and fewer than half indicated that journalists cover all sides of an issue fairly. 
But America’s trust in institutions isn’t entirely broken. Public school principals shined brightly, with the vast majority of respondents indicating that principals care about students and provide the public with fair and accurate information. Most importantly, more than eight in 10 believe that principals handle resources responsibly; local elected officials and members of Congress ranked at the bottom of the list.
Surely, this is great news — but there’s a catch. Although the public trusts principals, they don’t give them much power. Principals control only a fraction of education dollars. Most spending decisions are made by district officials and legislators. 
new study by researchers at American Institute for Research and the U.S. Department of Education drives home this reality, finding that, in the districts examined, schools have discretion over a paltry 8 percent of operational spending. Decisions over things such as hiring, curricula and contracted services are made by those furthest removed from students. This is especially worrisome since research also suggests that limiting school-level autonomy over spending decisions creates inefficiencies. As one principal puts it, “I know what’s best for my school because I’m in the school.”
So what can be done to push funding decisions to those closest to kids? Here’s a bold idea for state policymakers: send education dollars directly to schools. 
Currently, education dollars are funneled through districts, which then dole out staffing positions and other resources based largely on one-size-fits-all models. Not only does this approach to funding restrict local autonomy, but it often creates funding inequities since it fails to account for salary differences across schools. Sending dollars directly to schools would solve both of these problems by empowering principals with spending decisions and ensuring that funds reach the students they’re intended for. 
Some districts in cities such as Indianapolis, Boston and Denver have taken positive steps toward putting principals in the driver’s seat by adopting student-based allocation systems that give  schools more financial autonomy. While this is encouraging — under this model principals typically have discretion over roughly 45 percent of operating dollars — the overwhelming majority of districts are reluctant to move in this direction, thanks in large part to bureaucratic inertia, local politics and restrictive collective bargaining agreements.
The fact is, most districts can’t be counted on to give principals the discretion needed to align spending with school needs. 
Surely, going around the district-middleman will strike some as a radical idea, but it isn’t. Most principals in private schools and charters have this level of financial autonomy, and districts largely have failed to address funding disparities across schools. It would, however, require a radical re-examination of districts’ role in public education. Central offices still could support schools with services such as transportation, payroll and technology while superintendents and other leaders still could serve in supervisory and coaching capacities. 
For their part, school board trustees could focus more on compliance, accountability and capital needs, rather than school operations, about which they often know little. But principals finally would be the CEOs of their schools, rather than the middle managers they’re often treated as. 
To be sure, sending dollars directly to schools could present legal challenges in some states and teachers’ unions undoubtedly would fight to protect the status quo. That’s why policymakers might start by sending just a portion of operating dollars directly into principal empowerment accounts that principals control. Companies have developed technology to make implementation easy and several states have similar programs for families, often called education savings accounts. A great time for policymakers to pursue this type of policy innovation is when new dollars are injected into education systems, which many states currently are doing.  
It’s clear that Americans trust principals to do what’s best for kids — and it’s time for policymakers to do the same. 
Aaron Garth Smith is director of education reform at Reason Foundation, a nonprofit policy group advancing free markets. He previously was senior director of analytics at YES Prep Public Charter Schools, a charter management organization serving over 12,000 students in Houston. Follow him on Twitter @AaronGarthSmith.



Monday, October 14, 2019

To Fix America Parents Must First Take Back Their Public Schools . No DuH! Really

What are you going to do about it? Log on ParentGuardianshipSchool.com

Most Socialists are between the ages of 25-40 in the United States. They will be having little tyrants soon, who will be the American socialists of tomorrow. The moral of the story: Nobody knows as much as you think they do. Nobody cares as much as you think they do. Nothing really changes as much as you think they do. It just gets less important as didn't think would.

-MacontheRock



https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/31/take-back-america-take-back-schools/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork&fbclid=IwAR09FevQQbkuor7663ErEOACdH_0-C_qzH71EyG0oWs56q-IlX2tMM-w_Pk&spot_im_verify=signup&spot_im_token_ticket=d0029b8cfe0444df85e3cb543ef03e9f

WASHINGTON TIMES
- The Washington Times - Saturday, August 31, 2019
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
The fact that socialists are openly running for public office in America — that socialists actually hold public office in Congress — should serve as enough wakeup call that the nation’s moral and political compasses are skewed, in dire need of correcting.
That it doesn’t only screams this: America’s public school systems have become utter failures.
So the one thing patriots in this country should throw all their efforts into right now is taking back the schools from the far-leftists who’ve been able to dominate the direction of administration and teaching in recent years.
Look at America’s schools in years past versus years present.
“As recently as 20 years ago, the United States was ranked No. 1 in high school and college education,” Jon Guttman, a research director for the World History Group wrote at History Net. “In 2009, the United States was ranked 18th out of 36 industrialized nations. Over that time, complacency and inefficiency, reflective of lower priorities in education, and inconsistencies among the various school systems contribute to a decline.”


Between 1950 and 2009, the student population of America’s public schools grew by 96%. The growth in teachers during that same time was 252%. But the growth of administrators and other office staffers? That jumped 702%, American Enterprise Institute reported.
“America’s public schools are bloated with bureaucracy and skinny on results,” wrote Benjamin Scafidi at The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
Oh so true.
Whereas one school, one principal used to be the norm, nowadays that same size school employs one principal, multiple assistant principals. numerous assistants to the assistant principals and principals — along with all the accompanying office staff. That doesn’t even get to the guidance department, where ridiculously large numbers of guidance personnel are needed just to keep up with all the new social justice, diversity, tolerance and anti-bullying campaigns that pass as education, occupying school hours that could be better spent — that used to be spent — on math, history, science and the like.
Your tax dollars at work.
But let’s not forget the creation of the biggest bureaucratic bloated float of them all, the Department of Education, where teachers’ rights and union dollars take precedence over students’ achievement and real learning. Where the rights of the parents to control their children’s upbringing and education become subservient to the will of the government to train in the proper propaganda way. Your Jimmy Carter at work.
And this is what the government’s training has brought.
“Arlington Public Schools quietly push transgender policies despite parent opposition,” ran one Washington Examiner headline in May.
Another, from USA Today, from just a few days ago: “My daughter thinks she’s transgender. Her public school undermined my efforts to help her.”
There’s more, much more.
“The Racist Beginnings of Standardized Testing,” the National Education Association posited in a headline from 2018.
“How Black Lives Matter is moving into the schools,” The New York Post reported, just this week.
“Florida teacher reportedly banned students from wearing crosses,” The Blaze wrote in 2017, about a lawsuit that had brewed on behalf of alleged persecuted Christian students.
“Public Schools Teaching American Kids that Socialism is Better than Capitalism,” wrote Jeremiah Poff on ToddStarnes.com in May.
That one explains today’s political climate — yes?
But really, the transgender fight alone should fuel patriots in general, and Christians in particular, to sit up, stand up and shout out: No. Not in my backyard.
Not in my school is a boy who suddenly decides he’s a girl going to go into my daughter’s locker room and change alongside her.
Not in my school is my daughter going to be accused of hate speech for protesting the intrusion of privacy — the perverted intrusion of privacy.
And when the schools won’t listen? 
Throw the bums out. Run for School Board. Take over the local education system and dominate the discussions.
Set the policies, quiet the radical clowns, hush the petulant sue-happy special interests.
Send the crazies back to crazy town.
That right there is the single most effective action Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, patriots and traditionalists can take right now to right this teetering ship called Public Schools — and, in the long term, to bring back some sense and solid constitutional grounding to our entire political structure.
As Vladimir Lenin reportedly said, it only takes one generation of youth to transform the world.
The left, in America, has had its generation. It’s time to take back and teach right.
• Cheryl Chumley can be reached at cchumley@washingtontimes.com or on Twitter, @ckchumley.

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Failed Bussing Program Starts Again In Maryland


https://patch.com/maryland/ellicottcity/howard-county-school-redistricting-plan-protest-march-draws-huge?fbclid=IwAR3zBjchp8mhiA7evwlV92KJceU6MRdI7TJb6u7zpV9ex4JKsgT5oF7vLKk

Stop blaming both parties. Only one party hates what America stands for. There are two parties who have both liberals, progressives, and leftists registered amongst them, while conservatives just walk the talk, get a job and defend freedom with a gun if they have to. The other parties in 🇺🇸 just lie rhetorically and steal every idea to deny dilute and diminish the value of any value, custom or institution. Liberals have ruined the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Public restrooms, Women's sports, the NFL, and bankrupted nine states and the accompanied homelessness all in the name of equality that are misguided inequalities of answerable grievances. When food lines break out. I and most conservatives will be donating food and will be serving.
This all the result of taking too long to reinvent the public school system of statist progressive curriculum and multiple-choice exams. In less than twenty years there will be 200 plus congressman elected thinking like Ocasio-Cortez but lie like Pelosi. Look how bussing has returned as a reminder to those who experienced segregation. same old statist liberalism at works here. 

[Expect Success. Listen to WSQF 94.5 FM you blogger MacontheRock who bought back his freedom of Speech in Key Biscayne Florida in 2017 after filing the first ballot base Parent Trigger in US History in 2013. The un-American Law called Florida's Parent Empowerment Law 1002.33 (3b) must have its voting guidelines amended to remove Teachers vote in the on-campus election with two separate ballot boxes that award Teachers vote with veto power as the parent Proponent must win both elections.] ó

PS: There is an answer to these Politically Bipolarity policies that indoctrinates, marginalise students in the campaign of inequality by affect. Amend Florida Parent Empowerment Law 1002.33(3B). How is Now. After reading this article, Log on to ParentGuardianshipSchool.  com

Howard County School Redistricting Protest March Draws Huge Crowd

Parent Oppose Forced Busing of their children away from local school.

By David Dempster, Neighbor
 

  • Howard County School Redistricting Protest March Draws Huge Crowd-0
    (Pic
Howard County School Redistricting Plan Protest March Draws Huge Crowd:

Thousands of parents and children opposed to forced school busing marched outside the Mall in Columbia on 9/14/19. Parents in Howard County, Maryland, are outraged that their communities will be torn apart by forced busing, making their children endure long bus rides to far-away schools. Many children who now walk to school will be put on long bus rides and prevented from attending their neighborhood school.
Howard County Public Schools Superintendent Michael J. Martirano decided in August that over 7,000 students will be subjected to forced busing in order to achieve socioeconomic equality.

This grand HCPSS experiment was arrived at WITHOUT PUBLIC INPUT.
Protesting parents said it would be difficult or impossible to attend after-school programs, be engaged with their child's education, or even know their childrens' friends. Students were concerned about losing their friends, missing the bus, and spending their school days far away from their homes on the other side of town.
One mom told me: "We specifically moved here five years ago so my daughter could attend the excellent, diverse public school 5 minutes away from our house. She loves her school, her friends, and her after-school activities. Now she will have to get up one hour earlier every morning and take a 45 minute bus ride to attend a different school across town, twice a day. She will be separated from her friends and many of the most important things in her life."

The march was quickly organized on Facebook. Last minute changes by county officials required the marchers to be broken up into five groups and routed along back streets . Only a brief meetup in a back parking lot of the Columbia Mall was permitted due to public safety concerns.
Following Superintendent Michael J. Martirano's August decree, the Facebook group "Howard County School Redistricting Opposition" quickly rose up and gained almost 3,000 members. This group urges its members and supporters to change their Facebook Profile Picture to green in order to show support.
HOW TO SUBMIT PUBLIC TESTIMONY: With deadlines for public input early next week and strict HCPSS District requirements for submitting it, HoCo-FEI urges everyone to go to their website this weekend for instructions on how to submit your public testimony before the deadline passes here: https://hoco-fei.com/give-testimony?fbclid=IwAR0RoJVIs8MY87LTTvVg0-77fWkPPHJ585HGZgD3joy9NYeNF0JWl2anefQ
Children from more affluent schools will be bused into less affluent schools while children from those less affluent schools will be bused into those same more affluent schools to take their place. This grand shuffle will have children literally passing each other on the road as they are bused out of their communities.
With the Board hearing coming up next week, Howard County Families for Education Improvement urge you to visit
https://hoco-fei.com/give-testimony?fbclid=IwAR0RoJVIs8MY87LTTvVg0-77fWkPPHJ585HGZgD3joy9NYeNF0JWl2anefQ
Next week's Board of Education public hearings on School Redistricting begin Tues, Sept 17th. Info on how to attend is in the link below. Note that the HCPSS has deadlines and restrictions on who may comment and how letters are to be formatted.
https://www.hcpss.org/school-planning/boundary-review/public-hearings/?fbclid=IwAR3dAfDdxVASHC3AT7GdcdjSGlBapcvuv3EIIQHUkr_tk_vbgTg4mpcROvc#written-testimony
Pre-registration is required and may be done by phone
(410-313-7436, 410-313-1584, or 410-313-7194)
In my opinion, the requirements to give testimony at these hearings is outrageously burdensome and is obviously designed to suppress citizen input.
However, it appears that people may attend to protest outside.
All public hearings will be held at the Department of Education, 10910 Clarksville Pike, Ellicott City, with satellite rooms available for overflow.
Tuesday, September 17, 7 p.m.
Families currently zoned for Centennial HS, Howard HS, Mt. Hebron HS, Oakland Mills HS
Tuesday, September 24, 7 p.m.
Families currently zoned for Atholton HS, Hammond HS, Long Reach HS, Wilde Lake HS
Thursday, September 26, 6 p.m. (NOTE: Time changed from 7 p.m.)
Families currently zoned for Glenelg HS, Marriotts Ridge HS, Reservoir HS, River Hill HS
https://www.hcpss.org/school-planning/boundary-review/...